• Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Smart Cities Connect
  • About
    • Team
    • Media Kit
    • Contact
  • Verticals
    • Community Engagement
    • Digital Transformation
    • Smart Mobility
    • Urban Infrastructure
    • Urban Operations
  • Events
    • Webinars
  • Smart 50 Awards
    • 2023 Smart 50 Awards Application
  • Resources
    • Videos
News Ticker
  • [ January 27, 2023 ] Dublin, Ireland Uses Augmented Reality To Bring Back History Digital Transformation
  • [ January 25, 2023 ] Smart 50 Award Winners Demonstrate True Growth in Smart City Implementations Community Engagement
  • [ January 23, 2023 ] Paris Takes To The River For A New Mode Of Transportation Smart Mobility
  • [ January 20, 2023 ] Miami Takes The Gold In Energy And Environmental Design Urban Infrastructure
  • [ January 19, 2023 ] The USDA And NUL Collaborate For Equity Across America Community Engagement
HomeUncategorizedNew Orleans Sees Increased Public Trust and Feedback With Transparency

New Orleans Sees Increased Public Trust and Feedback With Transparency

November 27, 2017 Smart Cities Connect Uncategorized

In a recent talk Lamar Gardere, the former Chief Information Officer for the city of New Orleans, pointed out that giving citizens access to databases built public trust and increased feedback from residents.

The city began with the BlightSTAT program run by the Office of Performance and Accountability (OPA) which resulted in the elimination of over 15,000 blighted units from 2010 to 2015.

“People could see what they were seeing in real life was showing up in the data,” said Gardere.

The OPA team recently concluded a pilot program using behavioral science to improve voluntary homeowner compliance. Currently when a 311 complaint about potential code violations at an address is filed, the city needs to research and inspect the property before making any further necessary actions. Adding a new initial step was tested, whereby homeowners receive a letter stating that a 311 complaint had been made about their property. It was found that the letters meant homeowners were more likely to voluntarily bring their properties into compliance and the city, upon physical inspections, found a 6% reduction in code violations. This success led to full implementation of the program, saving the city the equivalent of approximately the cost of one full-time inspector.

If a property is not brought up to code, a number of steps are taken that can lead to the city having the legal authority to potentially demolish the house or foreclose on the property and sell it at auction. The decision is complex, as the city must take into account the property’s location, historical significance, market interest, condition, and other factors. In the past, this has led to a backlog of over 1,500 properties awaiting a decision.

In order to streamline the decision-making process, OPA tested machine learning algorithms on data that had been manually scored over 600 test case properties. Based on the tests, OPA built an in-house tool, the Blight Scorecard which enables staff to score a property and then receive a weighted recommendation between 0 and 100: 0 meaning the property should be demolished, and 100 meaning it should be sold. This has greatly increased the speed and consistency of the process and has improved the workflow of the city’s Code Enforcement Department.

According to Chad Dyer, Director of the Code Enforcement Department, “Using data to be smarter about our operations has been a total win for the city, for homeowners and for our neighborhoods.”

  • community engagement
  • open data
Previous article
Next article

Related Articles

Smart Budapest Road Map Positions City for Growth

San Antonio Unites to Bring Advancement in Transportation, Digital Living and Sustainability

Kansas City, Missouri Visualizes Digital Divide

Tweets by smartcityc

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
Stay connected
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use

© Copyright 2021 Smart Cities Connect, Produced by TechConnect