• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Smart Cities Connect
  • About
    • Team
    • Media Kit
    • Contact
  • Verticals
    • Community Engagement
    • Digital Transformation
    • Smart Mobility
    • Urban Infrastructure
    • Urban Operations
  • Events
    • Webinars
  • 2021 Smart 50 Awards
    • 2021 Smart 50 Awards Application
  • Resources
    • Videos
News Ticker
  • [ April 20, 2021 ] “Electronic Noses” In Denver Detect Industrial Odors Uncategorized
  • [ April 19, 2021 ] Growing Underground Subterranean Farm Responds To Growing Global Need For Food Uncategorized
  • [ April 16, 2021 ] New York City Clinics On Wheels Distribute COVID-19 Shots Uncategorized
  • [ April 15, 2021 ] Agritecture Reports Top 10 Cities For Urban Ag Uncategorized
  • [ April 14, 2021 ] Baltimore Health Corps Pilot Shares Progress Across 3 Objectives Uncategorized
HomeSmart MobilityMorality and The Third Mobility Revolution

Morality and The Third Mobility Revolution

March 29, 2018 Laura Benold Smart Mobility

By Laura Benold, Managing Editor, Smart Cities Connect

As transportation infrastructure becomes more complex and culture strives toward inclusion, it is critical that we take into account not only the utility – but also moral implications – of modern mobility. We are witnessing the third mobility revolution, that brings with it an opportunity like never before to correct past oversights and design cities to reflect a desire for livable cities.

“When we went from horse and buggy, we had a massive revolution of how people got from here to there. It changed how we built cities and land use patterns. Then we had the freeway era when we invested in interstate systems as revolution two. What’s interesting about those two is that technologies and investment came along with little thought about impact to cities. A lot of us see this third revolution as an opportunity,” said Adrian Pearmine, national director for smart cities and connected vehicles at DKS Associates in Portland, Oregon.

Morality and mobility intersect in three main ways specifically related to smart transportation:

1 – Machine versus Human

The trolley problem explores ethical implications of manufacturing and regulation of autonomous vehicles (AV). A question that frequently surfaces in the AV discussion is how machines make decisions about human life.  For example, if conditions in the roadway force a self-driving vehicle to prioritize one life over another (or one life over many), what choice is the car programmed to make? How does it gather and process relevant information? We are literally coding morality, and that begs for equity and transparency.

2 – Accessibility

Beyond the car itself, modern mobility has the power to include or exclude, to create winners and losers. Our transportation systems fundamentally determine an individual’s ability to get from point A to B and to have equal, affordable access to the city’s offerings. Especially for those who lack access to other forms of transportation, public transit personifies social justice and is an economic imperative.

“Like so many other big leaps in technology, there is the opportunity to engage between the public and private sectors to make sure the mobility revolution is being implemented locally in an inclusive way; but it means that the cities and MPOs and states need to actively engage in making sure that it is being implemented in a way that meets everyone’s mobility needs, rather than just letting the private sector do what it wants and whatever makes the most money,” said Pearmine.  “That’s the challenge because those that need the affordability mobility options the most are those that will be left behind. There is an opportunity with a combination of autonomous vehicle technology with other business models to see the technology roll out equitably.”

3 – Urban and Rural Considerations

As if city infrastructure weren’t enough to tackle, inclusion only begins with the infrastructure we create. What about the infrastructure that we neglect?  While innovators increasingly make a run at solving last mile challenges, it seems that only a smattering of solutions working together can bridge the proverbial gap. And that gap becomes a chasm when we consider the space between urban and rural communities. While cities move forward toward more innovation, are counties and states keeping pace? Who will ensure that a region moves forward together and that entire populations don’t lag behind?

When you consider the number of automotive-related fatalities in our current reality, the ability to create safer roads by decreasing or eliminating human error may be the biggest moral imperative of all.

“We can do all the things we can do when it comes to designing safe roads and lighting and striping; but none of that will change drunk drivers, falling asleep at the wheel, and other human behaviors,” shares Pearmine. “To me, the bigger morality question isn’t just around how does [the vehicle] make a trolley switch decision, but how quickly can we deploy the technology.”

We are all responsible for our transportation systems. City residents, industry, community organizations, city staff and policy makers must take an active role in ensuring inclusion, affordability, and transparency. The good news: city leaders and technologists are keenly aware and active in the sprint toward solutions. How will you contribute?

  • community engagement
  • mobility
  • transportation
Previous article
Next article

Related Articles

Knight Foundation Announces Five-Year $5.25M Initiative for Studying Autonomous Vehicles

St Petersburg, Florida Signs With Streetline For Smart Parking

What Makes A City Smart?

Stay in the know:

Tweets by smartcityc

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
Stay connected
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use

© Copyright 2021 Smart Cities Connect, Produced by TechConnect